This outcome further affirms Turnitin's reliability as a plagiarism detection tool. ![]() Turnitin successfully detected the entire article as a 100 percent match. Although it did not reach 100 percent, Cobot's result remained consistent with the findings of Turnitin. Cobot's ResultĬobot's result highlighted 91.2 percent of the content as identical, depicting its ability to identify direct copying. However, according to Turnitin, the entire article was copied word-for-word, indicating a lack of accuracy in Grammarly's detection. Grammarly generated results almost Instantly, claiming no plagiarism was found in the entire article. The article is publicly available on researchgate and the IEEE Library. In the final test, we uploaded an eight-page conference paper, totaling over 8,000 words, to all three plagiarism checkers. The thoroughness of Turnitin's detection mechanism leaves no doubt about its ability to detect verbatim copying from the source. ![]() In contrast to Grammarly, Turnitin accurately identified the copied text as plagiarism with a similarity score of 99. This result raises concerns about the reliability of Grammarly as a plagiarism checker. However, after running the test multiple times, Grammarly inconsistently detected the copied content as plagiarism. When we pasted the copied text into Grammarly, it initially failed to detect plagiarism and indicated no plagiarism found. In the Second test, we copied content word-for-word from a single source on the internet, aiming to assess the plagiarism checkers' ability to identify identical copying. Test 2: Testing Plagiarism Detection on Copied Text Notably, Turnitin also scans the student repository, making it useful for universities that use Turnitin to assess student submissions. The results indicated direct copying and paraphrasing in the content. Turnitin detected a higher level of similarity in the sample text, with a percentage of 64. Cobot even provided the sources from where the text was potentially copied, displaying its ability to locate original sources. This indicates that 21.7 percent of the content was considered identical verbatim copying, while 24.3 percent had minor changes. In contrast, Cobot identified significant similarities in the sample text, with a match percentage of 46. This result implies that Grammarly may not accurately identify copied content. However, in our test, Grammarly detected no plagiarism in the sample text. Grammarly claims to compare the submitted text to 16 billion web pages. ![]() The sample text consisted of a 2,000-word document. To begin our analysis, we conducted a test by uploading a sample text to all three plagiarism checkers: Grammarly, Cobot, and Turnitin. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate and compare the accuracy and reliability of these tools. ![]() Plagiarism detection plays a crucial role in maintaining academic integrity and ensuring Originality in written work. In this article, we will Delve into the effectiveness of Grammarly's Plagiarism Checker as compared to two other popular plagiarism detection tools, Turnitin and Cobot. Grammarly's Plagiarism Checker: A Comparative Analysis with Turnitin and Cobot Test 2: Testing Plagiarism Detection on Copied Text.Test 1: Comparing Results on Sample Text.Overview of Grammarly's Plagiarism Checker.Grammarly vs Turnitin: Which Plagiarism Checker Is More Reliable? Table of Contents
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |